Theater Hopper
About Links Store Contact Thorum

THOR THOUGHTS

May 12th, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials
Thor, Chris Hemsworth, Kenneth Branagh, Natalie Portman, Anthony Hopkins

Last night I had an opportunity to see Thor, which I was excited about because the last film I saw in the theater was Cedar Rapids and that’s kind of pathetic.

On the whole, I would say that I found Thor extremely entertaining and it was perhaps helped by my diminished expectations of the film.

I will say that at nearly 2 hours long, the film never dragged for me. And despite the final conflict feeling a little slapdash, I definitely wanted to see more!

I’ve talked with a few people in the comments section of the last two comics about my concerns the Thor is another set up for The Avengers in a similar vein to Iron Man 2. It is and it isn’t. The film tells a crafty origin story that is unfortunately a little light on Asgardian ass-kicking. A little too much time spend on Earth in civilian clothes is good for character development, but it didn’t exactly send my geek heart racing.

But, like I said, the film is entertaining and well-crafted. I can’t criticize it for what I wanted it to be. I can only criticize it for what it is. And I would say it’s pretty darn good!

The following are some random thoughts and observations about Thor. Let’s see if any of them ring true to you, shall we?

  • It’s easy to see why Chris Hemsworth was cast as Thor. He is confident, likable and not at all the dumb jock that I kind of think of Thor as being.
  • That said, whatever color they dyed Hemsworth’s beard and eyebrows was really distracting in close ups.
  • I kind of wish they had Hemsworth wear Thor’s winged helmet for more than one scene.
  • Director Kenneth Branagh did an admirable job with the direction, providing a few fake out moments and non-linear storytelling devices that kept me engaged throughout.
  • Let it also be known that Kenneth Branagh never met a Dutch angle he didn’t like. This film is littered with them, but it works. It adds to the aura of comic book dramatics without going overboard like Ang Lee’s Hulk did.
  • People credit Branagh for bringing “Shakespearean gravitas” to the movie. But the fatherly themes in the plot are so pronounced, I wonder if anyone would be making that observation if, say, Martin Campbell were directing.
  • Natalie Portman is very, very pretty.
  • Why the hell is Natalie Portman in this movie? I mean, I know she’s no stranger to big-budget science fiction and fantasy (Hello, Queen Amidala!) but at this point, a movie like Thor seems a little below her station, don’t you think?
  • There is almost no need for Kat Dennings’ character except to provide comic relief, but she makes the most of every scene she’s in and damn near walks off with this movie. I was more interested in the things her character had to say than anything Natalie Portman’s character had to say.
  • I love that Clark Gregg’s Agent Coulson is running around in the background. Gregg plays him perfectly with a touch of playful impatience.
  • Everyone caught Jeremy Renner’s cameo as the future Avenger Hawkeye during the scene where Thor first tries to reclaim his hammer, right?
  • Jeremy Renner kind of looks like Daniel Craig’s younger brother to me. They both have a heavy brow.
  • Even though I know Ray Stevenson (who most recently played The Punisher) was the actor who played Volstagg, every time I saw him on screen, I was convinced it was Chris Noth.
  • Hey, is that Renee Russo as Thor’s mom? Long time, no see!
  • Yes, Anthony Hopkins kills it as Odin. But he could do a role like this in his sleep.
  • I feel like I’m supposed to say something about Tom Hiddleston as Loki. He did a good job making him a sympathetic villain at the outset, but kind of tipped over into cartoonish super-villainy at the end.
  • The Destroyer is awesome and I want an action figure, please.
  • RE: The Destroyer “Is that one of Stark’s?” “I don’t know. That guy never tells me anything.” The humor in Thor was pretty sharp.
  • Bonus points for the Donald Blake reference – Thor’s mortal alter ego in the early comics. Kudos for the writers for not getting bogged down in that and telling a straightforward original story. Well, as straightforward a story about inter-dimensional warriors using weapons crafted with equal parts magic and science as you can.
  • I was also very impressed with how the effects department brought Thor’s unique powers to the screen. They could have easily had him hitting stuff with his hammer or call down lightning and leave it at that. But having him take flight, carried behind Mjolnir was very well done. Similarly, Thor twirling Mjolnir around by the strap was something I didn’t think they’d be able to translate from the comics as well as they did.
  • Production design for this movie is off the charts. From the costumes, to the Frost Giants, to the rich detail and rendering of Asgard – these images were truly otherworldly and God-like.
  • With this in mind, the fictional town in New Mexico where Thor lands looks faker than fake. In fact, I’m not sure there were even any roads that lead to or from that town. It literally looks like it sprung up overnight by a Hollywood construction crew.
  • Did anyone else find the use of the Foo Fighters song “Walk” over the end credits completely out of place?
  • Stick around after the credits for a bonus scene. I probably don’t have to tell you that, but it doesn’t hurt to remind you.

That’s all I’ve got on Thor. It’s quite a bit, actually! What are your thoughts? Leave your comments below!

└ Tags: Chris Hemsworth, Kat Dennings, Kenneth Branagh, Natalie Portman, review, The Avengers, Thor
[ 14 Comments ]

Related Posts ¬

    Mar 1, 2004ONE FROM THE VAULT

THE BILL PAXTON SUPERCUT

May 3rd, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

The following is a supercut of each of Bill Paxton’s lines as Pvt. Hudson from James Cameron’s Aliens condensed into one handy YouTube video.

Considering that the summation of Paxton’s performance can be distilled to roughly 6 minutes, I think it’s a compliment to him as an actor that he could create a character so indelible in our minds that people are still quoting “Game over, man! Game over!” over 25 years later.

When you think about it, there are very few protagonists that experience the character arc that Hudson does in traditional action movies. Most characters from that era were either superheroes or cannon fodder. Hudson was a little bit of both. Chest-puffing bravado at the outset, a pants-wetting fatalist after the first attack and a hero resigned to his fate by the end. In many ways, Hudson would act like we would in that situation and I think that’s why Paxton’s interpretation of him stays with us.

God be with you, Pvt. Hudson, you glorious coward.

Thoughts?

└ Tags: aliens, Bill Paxton, Hudson, James Cameron, supercut, YouTube
[ 3 Comments ]

HP7.2 – “NYYYAHHHHHHH!”

April 29th, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

Trailers are popping up all over the internet this week, signaling the oncoming rush of summer blockbusters. Once Thor hits theaters next week, all bets are off.

Case in point, the new trailer for Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows – Part 2. Or, as I like to call it, HP7.2 (so geeky!)

I have a history of “Meh” when it comes to the Harry Potter films. It’s always been kind of peripheral to my interests. I never read the books, I never got swept up in the hype. I’ve seen the majority of the movies, but DEFINATELY lost interest after the sprawling mess that was Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire.

I saw Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix in the theater, but I don’t remember it. I waited until Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince came out on DVD, but I don’t remember it. I didn’t bother seeing Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows – Part 2 at all.

I’m not curmudgeonly about it. I want to care. I just… don’t. For some reason, these films fail to connect with me. Maybe because they feel so repetitive? Or maybe they’re too British? And yet, that hasn’t stopped me from enjoying nearly a half century of James Bond films? What gives?

At any rate, here’s the new trailer. It’s… confusing.

Have you figured out what has me confused? Why did the people who cut this trailer together feel the need to include the same audio clip of Ralph Fiennes yelling “NYYYAHHHHHHH!” five different times? FIVE! What’s up with that? This is your last movie, people. Let’s go out with some class, can we?

Fiennes’s performance as Lord Voldermort has been the only interesting thing about the last 4 movies. The way this trailer is cut makes me kind of hate it now.

What’s your thought to the the new HP7.2 trailer? Are you prepared for the franchise to end? Leave your comments below.

└ Tags: Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows Part 2, Ralph Fiennes, trailer, yelling
[ 10 Comments ]

Related Posts ¬

    Jan 10, 2011TRAILER – THE MECHANIC
    Mar 9, 2011CARS 2: WILL EVERYONE STOP PREDICTING FAILURE?
    Apr 20, 2011WHAT X-MEN: FIRST CLASS GETS RIGHT

TRANSFORMERS 3 MIGHT ACTUALLY BE GOOD?

April 29th, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

The full theatrical trailer for Transformers: Dark of the Moon is almost good enough to make me forget that ridiculous title.

Almost.

I gotta give credit to whoever cut this trailer. It actually makes me excited to see the movie. It hits all the right beats and does a good job of making me feel like something is actually at stake. They certainly aren’t trying to play the cutesy-clever card like they did with Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.

Watch the full trailer for that one, if you don’t believe me.

Boy, Shia LaBeouf sure likes to shout “OPTIMUS!” a lot, doesn’t he?

What’s your reaction to these two trailers?

└ Tags: Michael Bay, Optimus Prime, Shia LaBeouf, Transformers: Dark of the Moon, Transformers: Revenge of The Fallen
[ 13 Comments ]

WHAT X-MEN: FIRST CLASS GETS RIGHT

April 20th, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

The new trailer for X-Men: First Class hit the internet today. Take a peek, won’t you?

Here is what X-Men: First Class gets right:

  1. Casting of James McAvoy
  2. Casting Michael Fassbender
  3. The design of Magneto’s helmet

Here’s what X-Men: First Class gets wrong:

  1. Everything else

Thoughts?

└ Tags: James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, trailer, X-Men: First Class
[ 11 Comments ]

Related Posts ¬

    Aug 17, 2011TRAILER – THE WOMAN IN BLACK
    Oct 13, 2011THE MUPPETS – TRAILER
    Oct 11, 2011THE AVENGERS – TRAILER
    Feb 8, 2011CAPTAIN AMERICA SUPER BOWL AD
    Dec 14, 2011TRAILER – ROCK OF AGES

TRAILER – EVERYTHING MUST GO

April 19th, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

The trailer for new Will Ferrell “dramadey” Everything Must Go showed up online a couple of weeks ago, but I’m just getting around to it now. Actually, it’s been occupying my mind-grapes for that long, so I take that as a good sign. Check it out.

Ferrell plays a borderline alcoholic whose wife throws all of stuff out on the lawn, changes the locks on his house and walks out on him. Sucks to be him. As you can probably predict, great personal growth befalls Ferrell’s character when he decides to sell all of his possessions and separate himself from the failures of his past life.

The movie looks pretty straight forward. But as someone who deeply enjoyed Stranger Than Fiction, I’m looking forward to Everything Must Go because it seems to have a similar feel. How much of that can be contributed to Ferrell dialing it down a notch is purely conjecture at this point.

I know Ferrell is an acquired taste and that any movement into dramatic territory will be immediately dismissed as a craven attempt at legitimacy by his detractors (See Also: Jim Carrey). But what do you think of what you’ve seen so far. Is it worth a look?

└ Tags: comedy, drama, Everything Must Go, trailer, Will Ferrell
[ 6 Comments ]

Related Posts ¬

    Apr 1, 2011THE HANGOVER TOO BAD
    Jul 20, 2011TRAILER – THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN
    Feb 9, 2011SUPER 8 SUPER BOWL TRAILER
    Dec 20, 2011TRAILER – THE DARK KNIGHT RISES

TANGLED – BLU RAY REVIEW

April 13th, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

As it’s 50th animated feature film, Tangled is very much the summation of Disney’s previous output. Depending on your opinion of the House of Mouse, that could be either a good or bad thing.

Personally, I think it’s a good thing. Disney has finally figured out a way to align itself with current animation trends and attitudes similar to what Dreamworks and their contemporaries at Pixar are doing without sacrificing the traditional story elements that make a film uniquely Disney. The animations has a snappy feel, a fairy tale princess is front and center and the dialogue is wry without sailing completely over the heads of children.

Most importantly, it’s entertaining. It’s easy for me to say that Tangled is the most fun I’ve had watching a Disney movie since Aladdin. Frankly, its wit and pop makes it one of the few Disney movies I can imagine watching proactively instead of through the filter of nostalgia.

Tangled, horse punch

By now you’re probably familiar with the premise behind Tangled. It’s basically a modified take on the German fairy tale of Rapunzel. But, smartly, what directors Nathan Greno and Byron Howard did was expand the mythology and gave us a much more satisfying reason why Rapunzel was locked away in that tower lo’ so many years ago.

While pregnant, Rapunzel’s mother, the Queen becomes very ill. The kingdom sets out in search of a golden flower rumored to have healing properties. The flower has been hidden away by the selfish crone Gothel, who uses the flower to keep her young. But once the magical flower is found, it restores the queen to health – and infuses its healing abilities in the strands of the young princess’s hair. Gothel steals the child away in the night and locks her in a secluded tower, cut off from society, as she continues to use the healing magic to keep her young.

Tangled, Mother Gothel, Rapunzel

“Why dat hair gotta be so long?” the audience demands. Easy. Cut the hair and it loses its magical power. Well played, Greno and Howard. Well played.

Of course, the problem with writing a movie about an isolated character is that there has to be some drama or change in the status quo for the plot to move forward. Meet Flynn Rider, a thief and a rouge looking for a place to hide after stealing the kingdom’s crown jewels.

Cynically, critics complained that Flynn the Adventurer was introduced as a marketing tool to attract boys (who would be otherwise turned off by a “princess” story) to the film. Considering the disappointing box office on The Princess and The Frog, it’s easy to see why some might jump to that conclusion. Certainly the flim’s marketing and Disney’s decision to name the movie Tangled and not “Rapunzel” would seem to support this theory.

Tangled, Rapunzel, Flynn Rider, Maximus

But it actually makes a great deal of sense to have the smarmy and charismatic Flynn as Rapunzel’s guide in the real world. It’s Rapunzel’s dream to investigate the floating lanterns she sees in the distance every year on her birthday. She doesn’t realize that it’s actually a symbolic ceremony from her kingdom longing for the return of the kidnapped princess.

Rapunzel, despite her wonder, is so closed off from the outside world she doesn’t even wear shoes. You need a fast-talking character like Rider to essentially provide both sides of the dialogue. Otherwise you’d be left with a movie where the heroine walks around, clutching a frying pan and looking confused for two acts.

Despite being the Disney movie with the longest running time since Fantasia, Tangled’s 100 minutes never lags or bores. In fact, if anything, it almost feels short. Time flies by as Rapunzel and Flynn explore the soft, rounded, painterly world developed by Disney animators using techniques they were tasked with inventing in order to achieve their look. Typically, whenever Disney sets out to create techniques to develop their films, the results are always memorable.

If I could be critical of Tangled at all, I think they almost made the process too easy. This familiarity with the traditional fluidity of Disney’s style probably made audiences feel as Tangled was something they had seen before. Considering some of the visual cues the film picks up on from Disney’s past (the romantic kiss in the boat from The Little Mermaid or Flynn “surfing” down the trench of a water wheel like Tarzan “surfed” across mossy tree branches) it’s understandable.

As a Disneyphile, I found the references endearing and appropriate for Disney’s 50th animated feature. In fact, these references were very similar to the visual cues producers of the James Bond films did for their 20th franchise film, Die Another Day back in 2002.

In terms of Blu-ray extras, I found them a little light on substance. A short behind-the-scenes feature called “Untangled: The Making of a Fairy Tale” played more like a bunch of bumpers ported from the Disney Channel and were stitched together with narration from the film’s stars, Mandy Moore and Zachary Levi.

There are a handful of “deleted scenes” (or, rather, slightly enhanced animatics), a couple of extended songs and two alternate versions of the film’s opening sequence. They’re interesting, but not substantive.

Most entertaining are the “9 Tangled Teasers” – a collection of parody commercials made for the theatrical release of the films that utilize the film’s characters.

Ultimately, the success of Tangled relies in its unique ability to be respectful of the Disney fairytale tradition while also keeping it pliable enough to have fun with it. The movie keeps things snappy, but never looks down its nose at you for enjoying traditional storytelling. The movie is a fine addition to any animation fan’s library.

Tangled, Flynn Rider, Rapunzel, lanterns
└ Tags: Blu ray, Disney, Mandy Moore, review, Tangled, Zachary Levi
[ 1 Comment ]

Related Posts ¬

    Sep 20, 2005JUST LIKE HEAVEN
    Jul 2, 2003ENJOYABLE

GREEN FOOTIE PAJAMAS

April 12th, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

Warner Bros. released three new stills of Ryan Reynolds dressed up in costume for the forthcoming Green Lantern movie. As I’m sure you’re all aware, he’s not wearing an actual costume, but a CGI suit that is being painted over his body by very lonely computer nerds in post.

Here’s my take… I’ve always felt that this movie version of the Green Lantern costume was needlessly ornamental and vaguely Tron-like. But I’ve gotten used to it. Now that I’m looking at this complete head to toe shot, I’m really creeped out by what looks like shrink-wrapped socks on Reynolds’ feet. Seriously, animators. I don’t need to know what the indentation of Reynolds’ toenail bed looks like. But, my! Those foot tendons are FABULOUS!

I swear, with this movie, it’s one step forward and two steps back.

Green Lantern, Ryan Reynolds, costume, footie pajamas

Do you have an opinion about Green Lantern? I bet you do! You should leave your comments below!

└ Tags: CGI, costume, foot tendons, Green Lantern, Ryan Reynolds
[ 12 Comments ]

Related Posts ¬

    Feb 15, 2011A WEB ANY SIZE
    May 9, 2012CARDBOARD COSPLAY

MECHANICAL LIFE

April 12th, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

The following demo reel from animatronics expert John Nolan demonstrates brilliantly why there is still a need for the artistry and craftsmanship of practical effects.

I like computers. But sometimes I miss the warmth of a puppet.

No. Wait. That sounds gross. Just shut up and watch this, okay?

[Best Week Ever]

└ Tags: animatronics, awesome, John Nolan, puppet
[ No Comments ]

THE HANGOVER TOO BAD

April 1st, 2011 | by Tom
Posted In: Bonus Materials

So Warner Bros. released the first full trailer for The Hangover 2 and… I think it looks terrible. Watch for yourself.

Seriously, it’s like the exact same movie, except it’s in Bangkok. Tattoo = tooth, monkey = baby and there’s another missing person that Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms and Zack Galafinakis have to find.

Hey, I loved Ken Jeong’s Mr. Chow in the first Hangover as much as the next guy. But does it make A LICK of sense that he would be in Bangkok for the sequel?

Incidentally, if I were Justin Bartha, I’d be pissed. He’s not the one missing this time, but he’s still relegated to the sidelines.

Between this trailer and Due Date being pretty much a straight rip-off of Planes, Trains and Automobiles, I am seriously concerned that director Todd Phillips has run out of gas creatively.

What’s your reaction to this trailer? Leave your comments below!

└ Tags: Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Justin Bartha, Ken Jeong, The Hangover 2, Todd Phillips, trailer, Zack Galafinakis
[ 7 Comments ]

Related Posts ¬

    Jul 13, 2009BROTHERS OFFICIAL TRAILER AND TEASER POSTER
    Feb 6, 2012TRAILER – THE AVENGERS, EXTENDED
    May 24, 2011I WON’T RUIN IT FOR YOU
    Jan 27, 2012TRAILER – LOCKOUT
  • Page 7 of 76
  • « First
  • «
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • »
  • Last »

Archives

    Tweets by @tombrazelton
    • The Comic
    • The Author
    • The Cast
    • Supporting
      Theater Hopper
    • Press
    • Ranked Comics
    • Year Three Backers
    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Tag Cloud

    Adam Sandler advertising announcement auction Ben Affleck buzzComix Charlie Christmas costume death dream dress up DVD fire first appearance Guest Strip Halloween help Hollywood Iron Man Iron Man 2 Jimmy Joe and Monkey Joe Dunn Nothing Nice to Say Oscar Oscars Pixar podcast punch review Robert Downey Jr. Shia LaBeouf Spider-Man store theater The Triple Feature Top Web Comics trailer Truman Victor vote voting Wizard World Chicago Zach Miller
    HOME | ABOUT | LINKS | STORE | CONTACT | TOP RATED
    THEATER HOPPER by Tom Brazelton - The internet's longest running movie-themed webcomic. Updating every Monday, Wednesday and Friday since 2002. All content © Tom Brazelton, Theater Hopper Inc. 2002 - 2009 unless otherwise noted. Please seek author's permission before reproduction. // Privacy Policy

    Integrated by Frumph |Powered by WordPress with ComicPress |Subscribe: RSS