After I drew today’s comic, I was a little bit lost as to what incentive sketch I should throw together that tied in with it. Then, looking back at the first panel, it kind of hit me and, well, this was the result.
Why is Goth Jared such a happy Goth? Because he feels so AWESOME!
After a summer of nearly no romantic comedy releases, Cami is suffering withdrawal and is jonesing for a fix. To that end, she is supremely excited for Just Like Heaven. I have to say that I agree. I am also very excited for this movie.
Sweet Home Alabama excluded (I thought it was cloying, regional hucksterism – trying to net that “NASCAR Dad” dollar), I greatly enjoy Reese Witherspoon in romantic comedies. She seems smart and winning and I think she’s fun to watch.
I’m also quite fond of Mark Ruffalo, who is charming in every film he appears in. His performance was the only thing redeeming about 13 Going On 30 and I like that he’s able to switch things up. His role as Detective Fanning in Collateral was also satisfying. To me, he’s an actor that’s pretty much good in any genre even if the film around him is total crap. He’s the next John Cusack without all of the “boombox-over-the-head” romanticism in his background.
Of course, the big news about this movie is that it’s the first post-Napoleon Dynamite role for fro-less Jon Heder. Gotta admit I’m suckered by his trailer closing line delivery of “I’m ninety-nine percent ∗parched∗ right now. I could sure use a ∗co-la∗.” What can I say? I’m easily amused. It’ll be interesting to see if he can trump such an instantly identifiable and unique character like Napoleon.
Not much news right now except I know there are a handful of you out there waiting for me to deliver a few shirts. I’m getting to it! Haven’t forgotten you.
I’m steering myself toward a sea change in my life right now and I’m kind of doing some stuff to put me on firm ground, mentally speaking. I’m making a couple of changes to my habits and routines. So hopefully I can kind of fold it into a pattern that allows me to be a little more productive while being a little less exhausted.
I’m looking forward to it.
Oh – I’m still looking for some programming help with the site. Mostly archive functions. So if any of you out there have experience with PHP or maybe even databases, please contact me!
Some people might view today’s comic as insensitive to those with cleft lips – or harelips, as they are sometimes known. I hope I’m not offending anyone. In fact, I tried to put Tom on the receiving end of his own insensitivity in today’s incentive sketch. It’s my odd way of trying to strike a balance in the universe.
I don’t have a problem with harelips. It just that in Walk the Line, it’s a very noticiable character trait of Jaquin Phoenix’s that is very hard to ignore when he’s supposed to be playing Johnny Cash. That would be like doing a Nirvana biopic and having the actor who played Kurt Cobain have a lazy eye. I’m just saying it was a distraction, is all.
For those of you who don’t know what I’m talking about, I’ve linked through to WebMD’s clinical description here. I try to be of help when I can.
And if anyone is still really, REALLY upset… then please forward all your letters to the writers of the "Moley-moley-mole!" joke from Austin Powers in Goldmember because that’s essentially where I stole this from.
The only reason I’m teasing Jaquin at all is because I thought Walk the Line was an exceptional film. One that all of you should see. Cami and I went on Friday and were thoroughly entertained by it. Walking out of the theater, you feel the distinct compulsion to go out and buy every Johnny Cash record you don’t already own.
There’s tons of great music in this film, especially at the begining. It was very interesting to watch Jaquin-as-Cash go out on his first tour with the likes of June Carter, Jerry Lee Lewis, Buddy Holly and Elvis Presley. Who knew they all shared a car driving from gig to gig in the early days.
That’s where all the good-hearted fun lies early on in the movie. All those great songs… it sucks you in! Eventually the movie settles into a lower speed and becomes more of a love story. Cash becomes infatuated to with Carter and seeks to marry her despite his own burgeoning family and wife at home. Carter is especially wary after two marriages end in divorce and the scornful eye "fans" cast upon her because of it. This painful societal pressure of the era is something the film captures well.
As most people know, Cash was an amphetamine addict . This aspect of his life folds neatly into the middle of the latter two-thirds of the movie, but it’s also where the film begins to paint itself into a corner. Cash takes drugs casually at first, but eventually consumes them as a way to medicate the pain of rejection he suffers at the hands of Carter who spurns his advances over the course of 10 years. The film makes a point out of portraying Carter as a paragon of virtue, but she comes off as totally oblivious to the pain she’s inflicting on Cash. She’s the reason he’s destroying himself as a means to get her attention and care.
Details aside, I think it’s the larger dramatic device of the love story that may divide people on this movie. I personally enjoyed this angle quite a bit because I know something about Cash and Carter’s time together and how utterly devoted they were to each other. It’s very sweet. But the movie doesn’t show us that. Basically, Cash proposes to Carter on stage in Canada, she says "yes" and the movie gives us title cards informing us that essentially they lived "happily ever after for the next 35 years." Maybe it was meant to prompt the audience to explore their life together more on their own time. But it ends up feeling like "Crap! This movie is already 2 hours long! We gotta cap this off!"
I think that’s where people kind of throw their hands up if they aren’t thrilled about the love story. I’ve talked to a few people about it already and some complained of expecting something different. What, exactly, they can’t pinpoint. I think these people were looking for more hell-raisin’ in the picture when that’s not really what it’s about.
That said, each of the performances are top notch. Everyone has made a big deal out of Jaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon singing all the songs in the film and with good cause. While Witherspoons voice is a little high and reedy to synch up perfectly with Carter’s, Phoenix’s portrayal was so spot on in points, if you close your eyes, you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference. Although his performance is not an impersonation like Jamie Foxx’s was of Ray Charles in last year’s Ray, I think his is a more accurate re-creation. Foxx got Charles’ mannerisms down – the swaying of the head, his speaking tone and whatnot. But not being able to do the same vocal tricks Charles could do was a sticking point. If they’re handing out Oscars for what Foxx did, Phoenix should be a lock for sure.
Not much else to say at the moment. I got word from my printer over the weekend that the last batch of t-shirts, baby doll tees and hoodies I ordered have been shipped. So I’m expecting those sometime this week. That means those of you who have been waiting to see your order filled will most likely receive a package either late this week or early next. America’s Thanksgiving holiday on Thursday will probably throw a monkey wrench in things, so be patient. You’ve been so tollerant with me so far. It won’t be long now!
For those who like to keep track, it is exactly one month to my birthday today. I’ll be 28 on December 21st. I don’t know if that’s worth anything to anyone, but I felt like mentioning it. After taking pot-shots at the cleft lip crowd, I’m begining to doubt if anyone will get me any presents this year!
Okay, the Academy Awards start in about 20 minutes and I said I would come back to make my picks, so here they are.
Originally I was going to do a huge write up about who I thought would win and why, but I don’t think there’s enough time for that now.
Anyway, here’s who I think will win:
BEST PICTURE: Brokeback Mountain. I don’t know if it was the best movie of the year, but considering it’s origins, the difficulty the writers and producers had bringing it to screen and it’s overall cultual signifigance, I think it should be rewarded. Crash looks like it might upset, though. Especially considering the complexity of the storyline, the large and tallented cast and the fact that it’s set in L.A. – where the majoirty of Academy voters live. If any film could pull an upset, it would be this one.
BEST ACTOR: Phillip Seymour Hoffman. If the Academy could nominate and award Jamie Foxx for his performance in Ray, then they most certainly need to recognized Hoffman. His performance transcends pure imitation. You really get to see the person beneath the public facade of Truman Capote, warts and all. Again, considering the difficulty Hoffman and his writing partners faced bringing this production to film, he’s a sure bet.
BEST ACTRESS: Reese Witherspon. It’s her time. Public opinion is with her and there’s rumor that she’s being paid $29 million for her next movie. It’s safe to say she’s assumed the mantle from Julia Roberts. Is there any other actress out there right now that generates this much attention? Okay, Legally Blonde 2 was a turkey. She might not technically be a great actress, but she’s a certified movie star. Moreso than the other nominees. Except for Charlize Theron and she’s already won.
I give points to Felicity Huffman for taking a more challenging, "actorly" role. But tonight, Reese walks home with Oscar.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: George Clooney. I don’t know if his performance deserves it. I haven’t seen Syriana. But, like Reese, he has good buzz around him. Especailly considering his other film Good Night, and Good Luck has him nominated in the Best Original Screenplay and Best Director categories. He won’t win in either of those, so this is his gold watch. I think mosty voters will have his name on the ballot to see what kind of speech he delivers.
If I had my druthers, I would give it to Paul Giamatti – one of the strongest character actors working today, bar none. But I think the negative press around Russell Crowe during the period Cinderella Man was in theaters has hurt his chances. Poor box office of that film also to blame.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: Rachel Weisz. I have no basis for opinon here. It just seems to be where everyone else is going. Some people are talking about Michelle Williams, but I really didn’t see anything in her performance that made me stand up and say "Wow!" From what I’ve heard, Weisz’s character is the lynchpin of The Constant Gardner and she delivers on all fronts.
BEST DIRECTOR: Ang Lee. I think this one is a landslide. None of the other nominees lensed anything quite so peaceful, beautiful and poetic as Brokeback Mountain. As the director of Sense and Sensibility, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and even Hulk, his versitility should be recognized. Right film, right time to give him the nod.
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY: Brokeback Mountain. It says more with less. Again, cultural signifigance pulls rank here.
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY: Crash. The complexity. The characterization. The multiple angles on the same story. It’s the most ambitious of the nominees.
Anyway, those are my choices. Really, a lot of the media outlets I’ve been keeping up with predict it the same. Really the only nailbiter is Best Supporting Actor. It could go in any direction. But the rest seem like locks. I think it’ll be a pretty standard affair for Oscar tonight. That is, unless Crash was able to perform some kind of last-minute rally. I view it as the dark horse. We’ll see!
Related Posts ¬
Feb 26, 2012 | 84TH ANNUAL ACADEMY AWARDS LIVE BLOG |
Jan 11, 2011 | HOLLYWOOD IS LIKE HIGH SCHOOL |
I guess they decided to call the movie This Means War because “Cockblockers” would have been a little too on the nose, eh?
Okay, okay. I’ll give them some credit. A romantic comedy that can mix in explosions will probably get a pass in my book. But, more specifically, any movie that calls Chelsea Handler and “old man” as least has a sense of humor about itself.
I’m not entirely sure why Reese Witherspoon would lower herself to something like this, though. The trailer makes her out to be a complete airhead, which is kind of contrary to the refined persona she’s cultivated up to this point.
I guess we’ll have to wait and see how it turns out. What are your reactions to This Means War? Leave your comments below!
Related Posts ¬
Jul 27, 2011 | TRAILER: NEW YEAR’S EVE |
Dec 16, 2010 | TRAILER – TAKE ME HOME TONIGHT |
Jan 19, 2011 | HATHAWAY AND HARDY JOIN DARK KNIGHT RISES |
May 24, 2011 | I WON’T RUIN IT FOR YOU |
Feb 11, 2011 | X-MEN: FIRST CLASS TRAILER |