Would Johnny Depp be any less attractive if he had the words “PUPPY KICKER” tattooed across his forehead? I dunno. You tell me.
I have to admit that I was a little bit terrified to do today’s comic. I’ve been suffering a wicked bout of writers block. I think it’s because I’m so preoccupied with the house and the move right now.
We’ve tied up most of the loose ends. Our new refrigerator was delivered today (we sold the old one with the old house), so now we can store food and eat properly again. Yay!
All the same, it felt good to draw again. I’m not as rusty as I feared. I kind of like how it turned out, even if the posing of the characters is a bit pedestrian.
As I mentioned in yesterday’s blog, Charlie and The Chocolate Factory was one of the two movies I saw last weekend. And what can I say, except that I left the theater a little underwhelmed.
It’s disapointing because I’m a big fan of both Johnny Depp and Tim Burton, but this pairing just didn’t do it for me. Depp’s version of Wonka is probably the least interesting thing in the movie. That’s not to say his performance was ∗bad∗, mind you. Just that there is so many visually appealing things in the film, Depp’s performance seems perfunctory. He’s competing against the scenery, and that’s not a good thing.
It probably isn’t a good thing either that I found the scenes with Freddie Highmore’s Charlie and his family outside the factory much more interesting than what was going on inside the factory.
I’ll give points to Burton for adding depth and dimension to the Bucket family when their appearance was something I hated most about the original film. But the movie isn’t called “Charlie and His Four Grandparents Who Share A Bed” for a reason.
Some of the things the movie did right were the Oompa Loompas – here digitally replicated from the single performance of Deep Roy. I also enjoyed seeing what happens to the bratty kids AFTER they leave the factory. It’s good to see their comeuppance extended whereas in the original they were sort of whisked away, never to be heard from again.
However, something I didn’t like about the film was it’s over-reliance on CGI – especially during the boat ride. The main garden of the factory looked good. Tactile and approachable. But at the same time, oddly striped of any kind of fantastic charm. Instead, it seemed to communicate “Look what our big budget could buy!” but maybe that’s just me.
Overall, I felt there was very little reason to remake the film beyond the fact that the spoiled children who seem to think they know everything and are given everything they demand are perhaps more relevant with todays generation raised by Grand Theft Auto. Otherwise, there’s nothing much it adds to the table. Watching these children be dispatched one after the other holds no surprise. Veruca Salt’s exit being the only one that even slightly differs from the original. Instead of wanting a Golden Goose, she demands a nut-cracking, highly trained Squirrel. Way to go out on a limb there, Burton.
At any rate, I have hopes for The Corpse Bride when it comes out in September. Obviously it plays stronger to Burton’s visual sense. And it’s refreshing to see him return to original material rather than remaking things.
I’ll have another blog later thanking everyone who contributed to this last round of guest strips. In the meantime, be sure to swing by Alien Loves Predator. I did a guest strip of my own for Bernie as he and his wife are celebrating the July 7 birth of their twins. Wish them your best!
The Michael Jackson concert documentary This Is It comes out today for a limited two-week run. Without getting into the sticket-wicket of commenting on the singer’s personal life, I will say that I’ve always enjoyed Jackson’s music and obvious talent. But as an “event”, This Is It doesn’t feel like something I need to participate in.
The movie is a compilation of interviews, rehearsals and backstage footage assembled as Jackson was preparing for a series of sold-out shows in London. That’s great – I mean, who wouldn’t want to see the behind-the-scenes footage of what was meant to be one of the largest concert spectacles of the last 20 years. But from a narrative standpoint, what exactly is going to be the payoff?
I mean, it’s not like we’re going to see the result of all this hard work and preparation. We’re not going to see Jackson on stage in front of tens of thousand screaming fans, pouring his heart and soul into the music and delivering the performance of a lifetime. We’re going to see him on stage at the Staples Center standing in front of a bunch of backup dancers wearing wifebeaters and track pants.
At least, that’s my impression of it.
From an entertainment perspective, I’m not sure what the audience is meant to take away from This Is It. At the end of the day, the man is dead. We’ll never know what could have been. So is the movie meant to memorialize him in some way or are the producers counting on some kind of morbid curiosity on the audience’s part to investegate Jackson’s last recorded performance.
There is a stop-and-look-at-the-car-crash element to this that I am skeptical of.
But to each his own. If you plan on checking out This Is It during its theatrical run, I’d love to hear what you thought about it!
As for the movie’s release, so precariously close to Halloween? I don’t really think anyone would show up at the theater dressed up like Zombie Michael Jackson. But if you’re going to any Halloween parties this year, I bet you’ll see more than one.
To a certain extent, it’s unavoidable. Certainly Jackson himself didn’t help matters any by setting the template for a zombiefied “look” with his video for “Thriller” over 25 years ago. Of course there is the bigger-than-life persona of the man himself. A celebrity of his stature is simply going to attract this kind of weird homage.
But if you take the macro view, it’s kind of weird dressing up as a dead celebrity for a holiday, isn’t it? I mean, how many people are going to go to a Halloween party dressed as Ed McMahon or Farrah Fawcett? Maybe they’re just not as iconic. Food for thought, I suppose.
What about the rest of you? Any ambition to see This Is It this weekend? What about Halloween? Going to any parties? What about your costumes? Share your comments below!
I have to live vicariously through you this year because we’re staying at home on Beggar’s Night. Immediately afterwords, I will be watching the live 7-hour lockdown of the Ghost Adventures crew on The Travel Channel – because I am a nerd.
CAN THEY MAKE A MR. BELVEDERE MOVIE NEXT?
June 14th, 2010 | by Tom(29 votes, average: 8.52 out of 10)
80s REFERENCES!
Did anyone else find it weird that they released a big-screen version of The A-Team at the same time they released a remake of The Karate Kid in the same weekend? Usually, it’s counter-programming that’s the name of the game with this kind of thing. Michael Bay releases another brainless marathon of explosions and Nora Ephron releases another brainless marathon of relationship foibles.
But in the case of The A-Team and The Karate Kid, it’s as if the Powers That Be said, “Two franchises from the 80’s? Let’s team up and take the box office by storm!”
Of course, that’s not exactly what happened. The Karate Kid trounced The A-Team at the box office this weekend by $30 million dollars, bringing in a surprising $56 million in ticket sales. The A-Team (which reportedly cost over $100 million to make) only brought in a fraction of that with $26 million. Despite having six projects in development (according to IMDB) expect director Joe Carnahan to be put on ice for a while.
I was kind of surprised by the negative reviews The A-Team was getting. It wasn’t like the original television series was High Art or anything of the sort. What were the critics expecting?
That said, the reviews did cool me on the idea of seeing the film this weekend. Which is a shame, because I was excited to see Liam Neeson in action. Neeson as Colonel John “Hannibal” Smith is probably as close as we’ll see him get to starring in Taken 2.
It’s probably not fair to be so easily swayed by negative reviews. But for movies I’m on the fence about, I’ve come to rely on them more and more. I used to be able to see two or three movies a weekend, regardless of quality. That was before kids, people. Keep that in mind. It’ll happen to you, too, one day.
Ultimately, what concerns me most about this weekend’s box office returns is that the success of The Karate Kid somehow confirms Jaden Smith as a bona fide talent.
The success of this movie will certainly inspire sequels, which gives Smith the opportunity to leverage that exposure and land more roles. Good for him, I guess. Call me persnickety, however, when I bristle at the level of nepotism that got Jaden through the door.
I think everyone agrees he was a cute sidekick to Will Smith in The Pursuit of Happyness. But watching the kid now, it’s evident he’s spent time studying his father’s cocksure strut. I don’t think he’s earned it yet. Never a more clear case of “fake it ’til you make it” are you likely to see in this generation.
Am I being too harsh on the kid? Probably. I mean, he’s only 12 years-old. But then again, I don’t know a lot of 12 year-olds walking around with a chip on their shoulder like Jaden Smith does.
I don’t know, man. The kid just rubs me the wrong way.
Did anyone happen to see The Karate Kid or The A-Team this weekend? Was I wrong to let the negative reviews of The A-Team influence my decision not to see it? What about Jaden Smith? Anyone else get a creepy vibe from that kid? Leave your comments below!