Since the action happens off-screen, there’s no telling if Jared actually succeeded in taking Ben Affleck’s head as a trophy. But in the alternate universe that ∗is∗ the buzzComix incentive sketch, we can peer through a mystical portal and view what could be… Click here uncover hidden mystery!
Incidentally, Jared’s been taking pot shots at Ben Affleck for years. I don’t think he would really try to take his head as a trophy. It’s more of a catch and release thing. The thrill of the hunt.
For those of you who are concerned you may have gone cross-eyed reading today’s strip, a sequel to Clerks is 100% true. Director Kevin Smith announced to the Associated Press last week.
Apparently, while working on the 10th anniversary edition DVD, Kevin got to thinking about the characters that unlocked Hollywood’s secret society to him and decided to revisit them 10 years after the events of the original movie.
According to Smith, “It’s about what happens when that lazy, 20-something malaise lasts into your 30s. Those dudes are kind of still mired, not in that same exact situation, but in a place where it’s time to actually grow up and do something more than just sit around and dissect pop culture and talk about sex.”
According the fan boy guru, Jay and Silent Bob will also be making an appearance. Which is slightly disheartening when Smith promised he’d hang the characters up for good after the all-out cameo laden road comedy Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back. Apparently after the failure of the more “grown up” offering of Jersey Girl, Smith realized where his bread and butter really resided.
The film will be titled The Passion of the Clerks and principal photography will begin in January of 2005.
Personally, I don’t know how smart is it to return to the “Askewniverse”. Clearly there is a large fan base out there ready to lap this up. But to me it indicates a kind of creative bankruptcy to revisit the same characters 10 years down the road. Besides, didn’t Richard Linklater experiment with this very concept when he released Before Sunset earlier this year – the movie that revisits Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy’s characters 10 years after the events of Before Sunrise?
Although I don’t know how much griping I’m entitled to here. That aforementioned fan base? Well, I’m part of it. More than likely I’ll see The Passion of the Clerks when it opens in theaters. It’ll just be interesting to see if Kevin Smith can keep his integrity after the fact.
“You’re analog players in a digital world.”
The line, delivered by Eddie Izzard’s character in reference to the suave criminal masterminds played by George Clooney and Brad Pitt. It is a declaration made by screenwriters Brian Koppleman and David Levien that is meant to crystallize the air of mythic cool surrounding Danny Ocean and his gang as a preface the third installment of what like to call “The Franchise That Should Not Be” – Ocean’s Thirteen.
I refer to the “Ocean’s” films as the franchise that should not be due to the fact that the original Ocean’s Eleven was a remake of a Rat Pack film from 1960 that wasn’t particularly well received. That is, not until decades later by people in denial over the Disney-fication of Las Vegas and who mourned the loss of brass balls cool in the era of free love. Yet, somehow, director Steven Soderberg brought something fresh to the screen and found cunning cipher’s to deliver his message of relaxed new millennium machismo in Clooney and Pitt. His take was an effervescent affair, mostly glossy, but entertainingly written with enough switchbacks to keep audiences engaged.
The cast’s affinity for one another showed up on screen – which I think is a large part of what pushed the first film over the fence. Inevitably, a sequel would be made. And while cast and crew took a few hits on the chin for having more fun making the movie than the audience watching it, I still found it a welcome addition.
But it’s almost beyond reason that a third film should be made. Each of the actors involved is too popular. Soderberg’s credibility as an indie-house darling stretched too thin. Could spending 4 months together on a set really be this much fun? Apparently so.
This time the crew is back to their own stomping grounds in Vegas. They’ve arrived to turn the screws on a land developer played with slithering tanorexic glee by Al Pacino. He’s muscled out his development partner, played by Elliott Gould, sending him into shock. The crew, gathered to his bed side, vow revenge. Instead of stealing huge sums of money or priceless pieces of art, it’s the crew’s goal to put enough of a sizable dent in Pacino’s grand opening that he’ll be forced off the board of his own corporation. I know – You haven’t heard about a plot this exciting since it turned out Episode I: The Phantom Menace was about the taxation of trade routes.
There are scams being run on this side where the crew is also trying to prevent Pacino from earning another Five Diamond hotel rating while also stealing a set of real diamonds Pacino buys for his wife each time one of his hotels reaches that milestone worth in excess of $250 million.
Like many of the “threequels” this summer, this is where Ocean’s Thirteen begins to fall apart. Too many plot points, too many scams, too many characters running around in what appears to be too short of a time frame and too many lingering questions that take you out of the action. Don’t even stop to think for a minute how much money it would take to cover all the travel, bribes and equipment Danny and his crew would need to run these scams and CERTAINLY don’t question where the crew could have gotten their hands on not one, but TWO of the drilling rigs that carved out The Chunnel. C’mon – it wouldn’t be cool…
It’s understandable why the filmmakers went this route. To combat the law of diminishing returns, you have to heap on the glamor, heap on the spectacle and heap on the courageousness. Ocean’s Thirteen does this spectacularly well. In fact, hats off to the art department on this film who created a fully-functional three story casino within a sound stage on the Warner Bros. lot. It looked perfectly in-step with modern Vegas with it’s aggressive use of red twinkling promise. Sets representing the different villas and suites within the hotel looked plush and decadent. The film looks amazing – bar none.
The performances, too, were well done. I still find myself wishing I could roll with the punches as well as Clooney does or wear a suit as sharply as Pitt. However, the boy’s club atmosphere is pervasive and the film could have benefited from the balance of a woman’s touch. Neither Julia Roberts’s or Catherine Zeta Jones’s characters make an appearance in the film and their lack of inclusion is treated almost dismissively. Ellen Barkin cuts a dramatic silhouette as Pacino’s right hand woman, but her role is quickly reduced to sexpot comic relief when Matt Damon, in character as the translator of a high roller, seduces her in the third act using powerful pheromones.
An alternate point of intrigue could have been explored when Vincent Cassel, the smarmy French cat burglar from the second film is introduced. But he’s wasted here, given almost no opportunity for dialogue and acting completely out of character for the sake of tying the two films together.
While Ocean’s Thirteen does a better job of tying up some of it’s more eliptical plot points than some of the other summer offerings, the final heist comes off feeling somewhat unfulfilling. There never really appears to be any threat of failure either from Pacino catching on, Cassel as the wild card, the authorities or even Andy Garcia’s character from the first movie who the crew turns to him for financing when they’ve run out of cash. More than anything, the biggest threat to the con are small management details. While the unintentional labor dispute Casey Affleck’s character instigates after infiltrating a dice manufacturer in Mexico is funny, is the any level of tension in whether or not the crew can reprogram a blackjack card shuffler?
Watching Ocean’s Thirteen, I was entertained. But afterwords, it felt strangely hollow – like I had been conned myself. The fact of the matter is without a sufficient villain for Ocean and his team to match wits against, there’s not much to admire in their adherence to the old “analog” ways of thievery. Like the actors and producers of the film, Danny’s crew has been in the game too long. They know all the angles and there aren’t any challenges left.
When The Bourne Identity first hit theaters in 2002, it’s kinetic style, exotic shooting locations and grounded-in-reality approach to the spy game had critics calling for the head of James Bond. Jason Bourne was on the scene. A new action hero for a new generation.
While 2006’s Casino Royale proved there was still some life left in the nearly 50 year-old franchise, it was clear the producers of the Bond films could sense the younger generation nipping at it’s heels.
Released in theaters this summer, the capstone to the Bourne trilogy made it’s way to DVD on December 11. The Bourne Ultimatum sold 5.4 million copies it’s first six days of release, sending a clear message that Bond isn’t out of the woods yet.
Director Paul Greengrass returns to the Bourne franchise abandoning the jerky hand held shooting style and quick edits that made The Bourne Supremacy hard to follow. This time out, Greengrass’s direction is more controlled and more efficient – just like Jason Bourne himself.
In the last chapter, we catch up with Bourne literally minutes after the last film ended. Wounded and on the run, he’s not in hiding for long after a London journalist publishes a story about him with direct references to his past. As Bourne tries to uncover his source, so are the political powers hunting him trying to do the same. When their paths cross, it’s pretty much a trans-continental chase sequence from there on out.
That description is somewhat pat and not reflective of the true spirit of the film. There are moments of quiet tension in between action sequences. There are ambiguous implications when Bourne is reunited with Nicky Parsons (Julia Stiles) in Madrid. Meanwhile, on the home front, there is seething animosity between CIA Deputy Director Noah Vosen (David Strathairn) and Pam Landy (Joan Allen) about the best tactics to employ in order to neutralize Bourne as a threat to the CIA. Landy is ready to talk. Vosen is willing to kill whomever he has to in order to get to Bourne – even other agents.
“You start down this path, where does it end?” asks Landy
“It ends when we’ve won,” Vosen states emphatically – in the most clear allegory to certain wartime policies you’re likely to see in a summer action movie.
A hallmark of the series, the performances are all top notch from a wide variety of talents. On location shooting in Turin, London and Tangier give Jason Bourne a real-life playground to operate in. Practical effects in the action sequences sell everything on screen.
And the action sequences don’t fail to disappoint. A series of bait-and-switch routines as Bourne tries to lead his journalist out of the congested Waterloo train station is as tense and engaging as one could hope for. A rooftop chase sequence in Tangier is exhausting and exhilarating all at once. And the final car chase and shoot out in New York City concludes with gritty force. All of these sequences are expertly handled and leave you on the edge of your seat.
Extras on the DVD feel a little on the light side, but all of them are substantial and add appropriate shading to the film. Behind-the-scenes filming in each of the cities they filmed in reveals the logistical nightmares of capturing things on location. A featurette on the explosive, close quarters bathroom fight sequence demonstrates the intense preparation production goes through to deliver an authentic look and feel to hand to hand combat.
All in all, a great addition to your DVD collection and a must-have for action fans.
On the surface, I think The Adjustment Bureau looks like a fun adventure. But I’m starting to role my eyes at films that are using the inevitability of fate as a plot device.
I mean… is it me, or are were seeing that theme pop up more and more these days? Maybe people feel helpless and there’s a hunger for movies where the hero shakes off the conventional and preordained? Tiny rebellions of the mind again societal norms, I guess.
Or am I digging too deep?
Stylistically, the movie seems mired in the conspiratorial trappings of 1950’s G-Men. Why they decided to give John Slattery and the rest of the bureau fedoras and overcoats, I’ll never know – other than it’s lazy visual shorthand for stodgy authority and sinister government influence.
Paul Southworth from Not Invented Here had a brilliant zinger about the film on Twitter that I wish I had thought of.
“What did members of The Adjustment Bureau wear before the 1950s?” he wondered. “I’m going with loin cloths.”
In less than 140 characters, Paul summed up what I thought looked so ridiculous about the movie. I wish I could have stolen his joke, but I’m happy with the direction mine took.
Not much else for me to talk about right now. Probably because I’m exhausted. Why? Because I not only produced this comic last night, but another as well!
Have you had a chance to check out Gordon McAlpin’s Multiplex yet? Well, you should. Because I have a guest comic running over there!
Gordon was away at Emerald City Comic Con this weekend and needed a little help hitting his Monday/Wednesday/Friday update schedule. I stumbled into a guest strip idea about a week ago and told him I’d be happy to share it with him.
This was kind of a big deal for me because I AGONIZE about doing guest strips for other comics. I’m terrible at it and it usually takes forever. I get hung up on trying to find the right “voice” for the characters. Basically, I don’t want to do anything that might misrepresent someone else’s work. I have high anxiety about it.
I’m trying to break myself of that habit, though. I set a challenge for myself to create and submit one new guest comic every month for the rest of the year.
I’m kind of behind on that goal.
I told myself that I would have a guest strip for Danielle Corsettos’s Girls With Slingshots by the end of Feburary. I’m still working on it.
The idea is good! Just difficult to execute. It’s also much longer than the typical comic I put together. It’s hard to find time to wrap it up. I’d say I’m about 65% there. Most of it is drawn and what I have is already inked. I only need to draw a few more panels, color, shade and letter everything before I send it off to Danielle.
Maybe she’ll use it. I don’t know. But it’s more important to me to get over my hang-ups about guest strips so I’ll be ready when someone comes calling.
Like Joel Watson from Hijinks Ensue, for example! Joel asked me to do a guest strip for him by the end of the week to help him cover the bases while he’s at C2E2 in Chicago next week.
Joel’s a good guy and I don’t want to let him down. So it’s fortunate that Hjinks Ensue and Theater Hopper kind of swim in the same geek/pop culture waters.
So look for those guest strips and more in the coming weeks and months!
Switching gears abruptly one last time… after sending my guest strip to Gordon, I asked him to give me the full recap of his experience at Emerald City Comic Con. I went to that show a few years ago when I was at a really weird place in my life professionally. I felt really alone when I first got there and – despite the great fans and fantastic indie-friendly scene in Seattle – and was wrestling with this sense of failure.
The show turned out well, of course. Actually, it was probably one of the best shows I ever went to. So I was really kicking myself that I didn’t go this year. Especially when I had made an effort to reach out to different creators in the conventions I’ve been to since then. It felt like a wasted opportunity.
Truthfully, I wasn’t sure I would go to any conventions this year – or ever again. I missed the boat on ECCC and C2E2 coming up next week happens on the same weekend as my 11th anniversary with Cami. I kind of felt like the universe was sending me a signal to give up conventions.
An opportunity came up that allows me to go to Chicago Comic Con in August. Most of you probably know this as Wizard World Chicago. Now, obviously Wizard has its problems – on both financial and reputation fronts – but that never really phased me. Wizard World Chicago was the first “big” convention I ever went to and I’ve always had success there. So it kind of feels like home.
Reading Gordon’s ECCC recap, thinking about Chicago Comic Con in August… these things get me excited. They’re the kind of jolts that can really inspire someone creatively. I’m eager to get back into the convention world.
It’s not easy. Especially with two young kids. It puts a hell of a burden on Cami when I leave for 4 days. It’s not fair to her and I’m mindful of that.
So, I’m not going to be going to a dozen shows a year or anything. I’m just excited that I haven’t written off shows completely.
Sorry for the bit of public therapy. But it’s the same old story with me. I’ve will have been producing Theater Hopper for 9 years in August and it’s too important to me to give up yet.
Since dropping the update schedule to once a week, I would say I’m a lot happier. I’m more well-rested and probably easier to be around. But I also miss the grind a little bit. I miss the opportunity to reach out like that three times a week. It’s a tough balance to strike.
I’d really like to make it to 10 years. I’m just looking for the embers that will keep the fire lit.
Until then…