For today’s incentive sketch, I decided to make a point. A handle bar mustache and a neck tattoo don’t make you a bad ass. They make you look ridiculous. Vote for Theater Hopper at Top Web Comics to see what I’m talking about.
The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 comes out on Friday over a VERY slow weekend with very few other releases. It seems weird that there is a lull like this at the top of the blockbuster season.
I have a cursory interest in the film, but only for Tony Scott’s particular brand of action directing. Even though his last two film Deja Vu and Domino were muddled messes, Scott gets a good length of leash for Man on Fire.
I’m not particularly interested in either Denzel Washington or John Travolta – which is kind of sad considering their roles as A-list talent. I think Denzel looks like too much of a sad sack in this one. Certainly the man is allowed to branch out from his typical action hero template, but it’s not how I’m used to seeing him. Washington should be running roughshod over this production. Instead, he almost looks incidental.
Travolta as the hilariously code-named villain “Ryder,” (Get it? Subway rider? Ryder?! HAW!) looks ridiculous to me for all the reasons outlined in the comic. I’m wondering at what point everyone sat down and figured out what this character’s look was going to be. It is as if in the back of someone’s head they decided “mustache = evil” and someone up the decision-making change vetoed them on the Snidely Whiplash protruding number that Travolta could twist around his finger. “Sorry, guys. We’re going with the handle bar ‘stache.”
Travolta has played charming villains before. Most notably in Broken Arrow and Swordfish. He didn’t have to bring a visual shorthand to that performance, so why is he doing it now? I guess those guys were supposed to be smooth operators. Maybe Ryder is a little more blue collar? Even so, if this is Travolta’s idea of a working man villain, it’s laughably bad.
The reviews I’ve read so far have said that Travolta brings a strong intensity to the character, so maybe I’m way off base with my criticisms. All I’m saying is that first impressions matter and Travolta as Ryder does not make a good one.
Switching gears here, I’ve been getting feedback from a few people that they’re getting error messages when they try to log onto the site. Their browsers are warning them of malware? I’m not encountering any errors, so I’m trying to gather consensus. If you are having any problems with the site, please let me know in the comments below. Try to tell me what’s on the screen when the error comes up and specifically what the error message is.
Myself and my web administrator have combed through the site’s code and we can’t find any malicious links so we’re suspecting it’s one of the ads being served through the ad network that’s causing a problem. We want to try to isolate that ad and shut it off.
Then again, we could be on a wild goose chase. Any information from you guys would be helpful.
If you have nothing to add about the errors, why don’t you let us know what you think of The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 instead? Are you going to see it this weekend? What do you think about Travolta’s look? Leave your thoughts below!
The inspiration for this comic hit me like a lightning strike. I wish I could figure out where it came from. My best explanation is that the most immature part of my brain was feeling neglected, sparked off and said “Hey! Pay attention to me!” Please enjoy the schoolyard limerick it conjured up for you.
I told Cami about the joke in today’s comic and she said she had never heard the phrase “He Who Smelt It, Dealt It.” At first I was surprised. But then I remembered she was never an 8 year-old boy and would have no context for such things. Nor the immaturity to appreciate it’s linguistic simplicity.
There’s something regal about the phrase, don’t you think? I wouldn’t be entirely surprised to find it as a passage in a joke Bible, for example. I don’t know. Maybe it’s just me.
I do find it curious that The Book of Eli has been dumped in the middle of January. Usually the post-holiday months are where studios jettison the projects they have the least amount of faith in. So why have Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman been relegated to the trash heap?
Apparently the critics aren’t on board with it, which is a shame because it’s directed by The Hughes Brothers – The guys who brought us Menace 2 Society and From Hell. Can you believe From Hell came out nearly a decade ago? That was the last time The Hughes Brothers had a movie in theaters. Wild.
Part of me wants to see the movie based on pedigree alone. That’s pretty much what convinced me to walk through the door for It’s Complicated. But at the same time, I kind of want to gather consensus from friends who have seen it to determine if it’s any good. I have kind of a natural avoidance to movies set in post-apocalyptic future because they all look alike to me. If I’m going to see The Book of Eli, I need to be given some hint of a twist.
What about you? Any plans to see The Book of Eli this weekend? What’s attracting you to this film? Is it the story, the characters or the actors? What was the last movie you saw based on the casting alone? Leave your comments below!