Don’t front. If you heard Don LaFontaine’s voice booming from the heavens, you’d be crapping your pants.
As any movie-love worth their salt already knows, the well-known-but-unknown voice over artist for all manner of movie trailers and television commercials Don LaFontaine passed away Monday. Don is best known for coining the phrase "In A World…" when announcing the next big summer blockbuster and – darn it – if the world won’t be poorer for it now that he’s gone.
For a lot of people, Don’s voice WAS the movies. Literally generations of film-goers grew up with him introducing their movies to them. The man leaves behind a mighty footprint and will be sorely missed.
Tons of tribute videos have been cropping up around the internet since news was made of LaFontaine’s passing. You might have seen this one already, but it gives a great overview of the man and his history in the industry and is worth the handful of minutes it takes to watch…
If you have a little more time to spare, check out this video featuring Don as well as four other well-known-but-unknown voice over artists in a piece filmed for The Hollywood Reporter Awards a few years back. You’ll crap when the guy from the Disney films shows up.
Apologies for there not being a comic on Monday. Between the Labor Day holiday and Cami’s birthday that day, I just got caught up in family stuff and couldn’t pull away to do a fresh strip.
In truth, today’s comic was a bit of a chore to put together. I’ve been in data management hell for the last 24 hours. I’m too tired to go into it now. Just let me get back into the swing of things a little and I’ll start posting to the site again with some more in-depth news.
But, for now, it’s Wednesday… It’s Hump Day… Let’s leave it at that.
Talk to you all soon. Have a great day!
I’ve made jokes about Nicolas Cage’s hair in the past, but I like coming up with different excuses for it. I kind of like the idea that his weird bird’s nest look is kind of beyond his control. Like everyone THINKS he’s balding, but he’s really got this fantastic follicle action going on upstairs…
Have you guys seen any of the trailers or production photos from Bangkok Dangerous? I really can’t figure out what’s going on with the hairstyle choices, Nic. This comic was *this close* to being titled “WHAT HAVE YOU DONE TO YOUR HEAD, NICHOLAS CAGE?” but it was too long.
I know Cage is supposed to be a hitman in Bangkok Dangerous and these kinds of unsavory characters aren’t the most fashionable. But Cage looks like an internet predator more than he does a cold-blooded hitman.
Just… ugh. No.
Hey, so long as I’m in an image posting mood, I thought I would share with you guys another custom sketch I did in support of the donation drive.
This one is for my good friend Gordon McAlpin from Multiplex. He was actually the first person to donate to the cause, so you’d think I would have gotten around to this sooner. But, like I’ve said before, I want to try to make these as nice as possible.
In case you don’t recognize the reference, Gordon is smashing a mailbox with Tom cheering him on as a sequel of sorts to this comic for Wanted.
Anyway, I’m really happy with how this turned out and I wanted to share it with you.
Sidebar… Gordon has a really great hand-drawn story arc going on right now over at Multiplex, so you should really check it out. I think sometimes people take Gordon’s talent for granted because he does his comic in Illustrator and they assume it’s all copy and paste. They overlook the fact that Gordon has to create all of those characters and environments entirely in the computer. But the also overlook what an excellent artist he is in more traditional mediums. So check it out, okay?
Anyway, back to the donations and the sketches… I haven’t talked much about the donation drive because, frankly… I’m just trying to get caught up on the donations that have already been sent in. I’ve been in touch with almost everyone and I’m trying to work on the art every night. But I feel like if I keep pushing it on you, one – it’s going to be a turn off or two – I’m going to have more work than I can handle.
As you can tell from the graph, we’re pretty close to meeting our goal, so I’m not to worried about the money situation. The data has already been recovered and is back in my hands. I’m just dealing with the fallout of the expense but am more worried about making good on my promises.
It might take me a while, but I WILL get your art to you! Hang tough!
Anyway, that’s all I’ve got today. No big plans this weekend, thank goodness. I bought The Muppets Take Manhattan for Cami last week on her birthday, so I think we’re going to try and watch that at some point. I’m looking forward to it!
I hope everyone has a great weekend and I’ll see you here on Monday!
I know today’s comic is a little on the dry side. But when a new Nicolas Cage movie leads the box office with a $7.8 million take reflecting the lowest returns in five years, that’s a pretty clear indication not much is going on. Anyone unfamiliar with Tom and his Spider-Man mask throughout the years can view references here, hereand here.
Back to Nic Cage for a minute, does anyone remember that Nicolas Cage was an Academy Award winner? Anyone?
Something that has seemed to capture the imagination of the blogosphere, however, was the news that Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire have been signed to Spider-Man 4 and Spider-Man 5. Apparently, the studios are going to try and film them back-to-back, citing the difficulty of bringing everyone back together every few years or so.
I’m kind of on the fence about this one. On the one hand, I’m excited for anything Spider-Man related. The more Spider-Man, the merrier, I always say.
But, at the same time, if someone had told me they were going to give it a rest after Spider-Man 3, I would have been okay with that. I found the third movie to be extremely uneven and I still haven’t bothered to add it to my DVD collection years later. Remember that you’re talking to the guy who owns about 300 issues of Amazing-Spider Man.
What I find craziest about the news that’s been leaking out about the deal is that studio bosses were talking about potential replacements for Tobey Maquire up to a few weeks ago, but had no ambitions for replacing Kirsten Dunst.
Now, there is no deal in place for Dunst to return. But I take this to mean one of two things: Either they plan on moving ahead without her (which would be weird considering Peter and Mary Jane are now married in the film’s continuity) OR… they have such conviction of her talent, they simply can’t imagine another actress filling the role.
Please note the sarcasm dripping off that last statement. I can literally think of about two dozen more capable actresses for the part. Alica Witt, line one, please! Hey! She wouldn’t even have to dye her hair! We’re already saving money!
Odds are Dunst will sign on because she has nothing else happening for her career-wise.
Not much else for me to report today. But be sure to tune into The Triple Feature tonight at 9:00 PM CST. We took last Monday off for the Labor Day holiday, so we have a bunch of movie to go over tonight.
Oh – and because we care about you, the listener. We devised a much easier way for you to remember the URL where you can listen to and download the podcast every week. Just type http://www.thetriplefeature.com into your address bar and you’ll be magically redirected to our page over at TalkShoe.com! Cool, huh? Easy to remember, too! Tell your friends!
Talk to you later!
I admit to 100% full hackery with today’s joke. Hence, the brick wall comedy club backdrop at the Ha-Ha Hut.
Can you really be all that mad at me, though – considering I’m taking a pot-shot at The Women?
We talked about this briefly on The Triple Feature Monday night, but The Women looks like someone took a two dozen chick flicks, threw them into a crock pot for 72 hours and served the soppy, boiled reduction as legitimate cinematic nourishment. Like asking for a chicken sandwich and someone serving you a ladle-full of broth between two pieces of bread.
Each one of the characters looks like a cloying stereotype that women can identify with. “I’m the have-it-all career woman! I’m the Earth-mother! I’m the bitchy lesbian!” Whatever floats your boat, I guess. I’ve been pretending I’m Tony Stark going on… 5 months now?
In a recent issue of Entertainment Weekly, there is a huge flow chart demonstrating the myriad of different actors, directors, writers and producers attached to The Women over the last 10 years it’s been in production. Think about this for a minute. 10 years? Maybe it’s wrong for me to judge based on first impressions, but this doesn’t look like the kind of product that’s been honed into an insightful commentary about the complicated dynamics of female relationships.
I feel like I’m representing a double-standard, though. Tropic Thunder was in development for a similar length of time due to the controversial aspects of the piece. Personally, I felt like the refinement showed through. There really wasn’t a point in the movie where I was looking at my watch. I thought it was very lean… very efficient. And every joke hit the mark.
So why are my expectations for The Women so low? Gender bias, I suppose. I never read the novel on which the movie is based (why would I?) But as I’ve said in the past, I’m down for a well-made chick flick from time to time. There is something to be said for dependability.
It’s that damn trailer. It sets the bar so low. I just don’t have high hopes. Time will tell, I suppose.
That’s it for me today. Half through the week already? Crazy!
I’ll see you here on Friday! Take care!
I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t thinking about this comic from the old days of my buddy Mitch Clem’s strip, San Antonio Rock City. Whenever I think of Al Pacino doing his thing from Scent of a Woman, that’s the visual I imagine.
I’m not really as critical of Righteous Kill as I depict myself to be in this comic. In fact, I’m kind of excited to see it and will probably sneak out of the house Saturday night to catch a late showing (Cami has no interest in seeing it).
But one can’t help but feel that at the age of 65 and 68 respectively, Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino might be a little long in the tooth for this kind of gritty crime drama. I mean, this movie co-stars 50 Cent. What’s up with that? Was DMX busy, or something?
I need to admit to the resentment I feel after watching Heat, which promised great things from the duo in their first on-screen meeting. I’m sorry, but a five minute exchange in a diner is not the great meeting of the minds I had hoped for. Heat’s a great movie, though. So you can’t be too mad.
My friend Joe Dunn had a good point about DeNiro and Pacino. They should have been making movies together every 5 years since 1977. But he also reserves judgment and points out the reason DeNiro and Pacino have managed to stay relevant is because they’re damn good actors.
Righteous Kill probably won’t be the movie we want it to be and it certainly won’t tarnish the careers of either actor. But it’s frustrating that the stars didn’t align earlier so audiences could enjoy these two bouncing off of each other in more movies. It’s not right that DeNiro has shared the screen with Pacino the same number of times as he has with Billy Crystal. It’s just not right.
Short blog post from me today, guys. Have a good weekend and I’ll see you here on Monday!
I’m aware that indie movies were already once skewered in My Big, Fat Independent Movie. I just like the idea of The Coen’s scraping the bottom of the barrel with a “wacky” parody movie.
I think they actually are going through with an Indie Movie… from the “Movie” Movie people. Scary Movie, Epic Movie, Date Movie and so on. I don’t follow what those guys do very closely. I find it depresses me to know too much.
For the record, I don’t find it surprising that The Coen Brothers would follow up No Country For Old Men with Burn After Reading. I mean, when you’ve already done something as serious, violent and poetic as No Country For Old Men, what other direction could you go in? You might as well blow off a little steam.
Although I think The Coen’s have an excellent perverse sense of humor, I really haven’t been a fan of their recent comedies. The Ladykillers seemed like an excuse for Tom Hanks to try on a Foghorn Leghorn accent for size and Intolerable Cruelty pretty much cooled me to the idea of watching Catherine Zeta-Jones in anything ever again. I guess I like my Coen’s dark and foreboding. Miller’s Crossing? Fargo? Hell, yes!
I didn’t get a chance to see Righteous Kill like I had hoped and I’m kind of bummed because I don’t think we’ll get another opportunity to see DeNiro and Pacino work together like this on screen again anytime soon. Certainly if the film’s 3rd place take at the box office has anything to say about it.
Tune in to The Triple Feature podcast tonight at 9:00 PM CST for discussion on that topic and many more. Be sure to listen live through TalkShoe.com so you can participate in the lively chat filed discussion that goes on while we record. If you want to chime in on the discussion, let us know and we’ll get you involved.
Do you guys remember the new URL to access the show?
http://www.thetriplefeature.com
Easy as pie! See you there tonight!
GUEST STRIP – RYAN ESTRADA
September 17th, 2008 | by Tom- Comics »
- Comics »
- Guest Strip
(7 votes, average: 6.71 out of 10)
Do not adjust the internet. Ryan Estrada has taken over. Your regularly scheduled Theater Hopper will resume on Friday.
Hat’s off to Ryan Estrada and his wholesale hijacking of this comic and every other. I always get a kick out of seeing Ryan make his mark in this way and am more than happy to play along. Hey, it gives a night off!
So what have I been doing with my night off? Well, I was watching Speed Racer, which came out on DVD yesterday (expect a full review in the near future). I’m kind of kicking myself that I didn’t see this in the theater because I’m now a big fan of the visual style. But you know how it goes… They bungled the advertising on this thing – couldn’t decide if it was supposed to be a blockbuster or a kid’s movie (for the record, it’s for kids). Plus, The Wachowski’s kind of pissed away their cred after the third Matrix movie.
But, yeah… the movie is a visual feast.
Then again, I’m only half way through it… which was actually going to be my next complaint. For a movie that’s supposed to be all about speed, it’s ponderously slow with it’s pacing. So we’ll see how the second act turns out. I don’t want to give up too much of my review just yet!
Short and sweet today, guys. That’s all I have for you. I’ll see you here on Friday with a brand new comic!
Have a great day!
So first things first… About Friday’s comic.
I know, I know. I totally dropped the ball and I feel terrible about it. Basically, I had a conflict at work with a last minute project that soaked up all of my time Thursday and Friday that prevented me from getting a comic online. But the time I had any free time left, it was practically Saturday and I thought I was just better off shelving the comic until today. I should have been in closer communication with you guys and I’m sorry.
If you’ve been following Theater Hopper for any length of time, you know I take this kind of thing pretty seriously. I’m not one of those guys who is going to flake out on your an update “whenever I get around to it.” I treat this gig seriously and I take it as a serious commitment.
With that said, let’s talk about today’s comic.
I might be getting myself in trouble again trying to tackle racial content (even after apologizing for making lame attempts in the past). But I don’t think I’m picking up on anything outlined in the plot synopsis of Lakeview Terrace that the producers of the film didn’t want us to discuss. They pretty much announce it in the trailer when Patrick Wilson’s uptight white neighbor character talks to his lawyer about what he can do to protect his family from the increasingly aggressive neighbor played by Samuel L. Jackson.
“There’s not much you can do,” says the lawyer. “Plus, he has the color issue on his side. And that color… happens to be… BLUE!”
*GASP!* He’s a cop!
The fact of the matter is, this movie would lose half of it’s steam if the cop played by Jackson were of any other ethnicity BUT black. If it was an Asian actor in the role, it would have been just another lame home-invasion thriller.
I’m not saying that the race card being thrown into the mix makes the movie better. I’m just saying… “Buyer Beware.” This film was directed by Neil LaBute who – as a screenwriter – never found a painful social hypocrisy he didn’t feel like shining a great big spotlight on. If you’ve seen In The Company of Men, you know what I’m talking about.
Some people might find LaBute’s predilection for highlighting these issues commendable. I find them exploitative. Not that I expect LaBute to spoon feed us any kind of resolution, but his movies have a habit of parading the most ugly aspects of human beings in front of us and he lets them sit there for us to make a judgment about them. I think the passivity he displaces toward these characters reflects a greater indifference to their attitudes and behavior, which is just as much of an endorsement as anything else. To put it another way, “If you don’t condemn it, you must endorse it.”
Maybe I take LaBute’s work a little too personally because of how uncomfortable it makes me feel. Again, one could argue that his tactics are working. Because what would I have to feel uncomfortable about otherwise?
But I counter that I think his work is not there to evolve any level of discourse. I think his work exists to provoke. I think his work represents a need to hide something ugly within himself, so he uses characters with far more vile traits to hide behind.
Just my two cents. For what it’s worth.
We’ll likely get into these discussions and more at 9:00 PM CST during our weekly recording of The Triple Feature podcast – which you can now access through http://www.thetriplefeature.com
Keep in mind that we are also accepting questions from listeners about anything and everything. You can send us questions about this week’s movies, films we’re looking forward to or even questions about our comics. Send your inquiries to group@thetriplefeature.com and we’ll do our best to answer them on-air.
That does it for me! Thanks again for your patience this week and come back to the site later today for an important announcement regarding the donation drive!
Let me take this opportunity to express regret for any misgivings about Speed Racer I may have previously communicated.
One week after Iron Man was released, I was in a bit of a haze, but I remember the internal conflict that kept me from seeing Speed Racer in theaters: the marketing is sending mixed messages, the reviews are terrible, the trailer makes it look like a Willy Wonka NASCAR fever dream.
All of that was a mistake.
Speed Racer is a visual marvel, one of the most hyper kinetic, viscerally exciting films of the year. Forget eye candy. This movie is eye heroin.
Things get off to a slow start, but only because there is so much exposition to cover. Through a series of flashbacks, we learn how the young Speed Racer thinks of nothing but getting behind the wheel of a T-180 and dominating over the competition like his big brother Rex. Family tragedy threatens to derail the Racer family legacy, but nothing can quell the indomitable spirit of racing. Speed beings to make a name for himself out on the track.
In the present, Speed’s talent has attracted the attention of Royalton Industries – a giant business conglomerate that wants to add Speed to its stable of racers. Conflict is set into motion when the proudly independent Speed declines Royalton’s offer and it is revealed to him that racing is merely a front for business deals and technological advances. Races don’t matter, drivers don’t matter and any competition of merit has been fixed since the 1940’s.
I only recount the details of the plot to frame them within the context of how little they matter. These details only serve to tie together the film’s three large set pieces – the races themselves.
Granted, a movie strictly about racing would be pretty boring so it makes sense that the filmmakers tried to put a little meat on these bones. But they tend to overdo it. And, for a kids film, spend entirely too much time inflating the value of what Speed brings to racing as an incorruptible force.
Several times in the film, Speed’s driving ability is compared to that of an artist, essentially contrasting the soullessness of corporate influence to the beauty and innovation of the artistic spirit. It’s kind of an odd statement to make considering how much of the film’s $120 million budget is literally splashed onto the screen.
But once I got past the second act, several of the criticisms I had set aside peeled away and disappeared into the slipstream. Even though Speed’s victory is assured, the film does a great job of drawing out the tension and injecting nervous anticipation into his final race. The film ended with me feeling proud for his accomplishment and in the same celebratory mood as Speed and the rest of his family.
Considering everything that transpired on screen was merely the figment of some Ritalin-starved animator, that’s a pretty impressive feat.
I don’t mean to overlook the human component of Speed Racer. The casting for this film is excellent from top to bottom. Emile Hirsch plays Speed with the appropriate amount of innocence and competition. John Goodman was born to play Pops and manages to wring some emotion out of what could have otherwise been a stodgy family conflict. Christina Ricci is a delight as Speed’s girlfriend Trixie (I move to make it a law that Ricci keep her hair in a permanent bob) and even Matthew Fox comes off well behind the deathly serious (and slightly wooden) exterior of Racer X. I even found Paulie Litt as Speed’s little brother Spritle endearing when I usually cast disdain over over-expressive child actors. Keep an eye on this kid. He’s the new Spencer Breslin.
Considering the technical innovation on display in the film, it’s curious that the DVD extras are reduced to two anemic behind-the-scenes offerings. If there was any question about whether or not Speed Racer was a kids film, it’s answered in the feature “Sprittle in the Big Leagues,” which features Paulie Litt as he wanders around the Berlin studio where Speed Racer is being filmed, learning about the film making process.
Interesting facts in the feature? We learn that Speed Racer took 60 days to film and that Emile Hirsch wears shorts inside the gimbals of the Mach 5 instead of his full racing suit costume!
The other feature “Speed Racer: Supercharged” gives an overview of the different cars created for the film using spinning 3D models and a cacophony of technobabble to describe the various engines, weaponry and technology packed into every car.
Incidentally, directing siblings The Wachowski’s are nowhere to be seen in either feature. Suffice to say, Speed Racer did not get the appropriate treatment it deserved in terms of delivering a more detailed look inside the development of the film.
It’s hard to imagine any film being so thoroughly drenched in digital glop that it could spawn a whole new sub-genre of film. Movies like Hostel and Saw helped coin the term “torture porn.” Speed Racer could easily be the catalyst for “CG porn.”
For fans of movies with a unique visual identity, there’s lots to love in Speed Racer. Plan on taking advantage of your DVD’s “pause” button when dissecting the level of detail, color and fury squeezed into every shot. Those of you looking for a satisfying story are probably best left to the original cartoon series. But give Speed Racer a shot. You won’t be disappointed.
Speed Racer is available to own on DVD, Blu-ray and On Demand. For more information, check out the official site at www.speedracerthemovie.com
INDIFFERENCE IS A DISH BEST SERVED COLD
September 24th, 2008 | by Tom(7 votes, average: 9.29 out of 10)
I’m kind of over my Shia hate. At least for right now I am. I dunno. Eagle Eye doesn’t look like the kind of movie I need to get worked up about. I liked it much better when it was Enemy of the State. No, scratch that. I think it was better when it was called The Game.
Talk to me next summer when Transformers 2 comes out.
I might end up seeing Eagle Eye this weekend, though. But only if Choke doesn’t end up in a theater near me. I’d much rather see that. As far as Eagle Eye is concerned, I’m down for seeing any movie that doesn’t have the where-with-all to pull a trailer featuring a vehicle doing a jack knife through an intersection after LaBeouf’s last run in with the law. Way to brush that little episode out of the corners of our collective memory bank, Dreamworks marketing department!
But hey, Shia’s stubble is starting to look really nice. A little less Trash ‘Stach for this outing, eh, Shia?
Besides, you’ve got to love a movie that uses the line “They’re hacking into the POWER GRID!”
Uh-huh. Sure they are.
Oh, golly. Would you look at that? Here I am talking about how I’m off the Shia Hate Train and all it takes is a couple of scratches to find it bubbling below the surface. What a hypocrite I am.
Oh, well. Gotta pack it in for now. I have a big presentation about Limited-Effects Theory for my Mass Communications course this evening. So I’m kind of distracted thinking about that – hoping I don’t blow the introduction. Wish me luck and be sure to come back to the site tomorrow for a review of Sex and the City, recently released on DVD. I’m switching it up for this one. I’ll be interviewing Cami and asking her what she thought of the film! So something unique for your Thursday!
Stay tuned!