Now that I’ve effectively taken the start of your week and dumped it in the toilet with depressing, self-important nonsense – I’ve decided to announce the winner of the Wizard World Chicago 2006 mailing list sign-up contest!
You may remember that I mentioned a few weeks ago that everyone who signed up for the mailing list (see the form on the right) would have a chance to win a $50 gift certificate from Fandango.com! The original plan was to announce the winner last Monday.
Well, that didn’t happen.
I could make a few excuses for you. I was busy sending out pre-orders of "Theater Hopper: Year One." I had family commitments with out-of-state in-laws. I was mauled by wombats. Whatever. At the end of the day, I was just really lazy and hadn’t unpacked all my gear from Chicago and failed to input the e-mail addresses of everyone that gave me their e-mails from my three days in Artist’s Alley.
Well, that’s over and done with! I’m all caught up and ready to announce the winner!
Congratulations to Zack Franks who has been notified by e-mail regarding his win!
Zach, the Fandango.com gift certificate will be on it’s way soon.
Thanks to everyone who has signed up. If you missed this contest, now would be a good time to sign up so you’re ready for the next one. The winner of the Fandango.com gift certificate was pulled from a random drawing of ALL the mailing list recepients. And don’t worry – I won’t spam you. It’s just a way for me to let you know about important stuff going on here at the site. For example, our impending site redesign or an option to pre-order "Theater Hopper: Year Two" – which will be occuring in the next few months.
Stay connected to all things Theater Hopper through the mailing list!
My good friend Daniel over at Digital Entertainment News aske me to notify all of you about the contest he is running over at his site.
Daniel is giving away a copy of Ultimate Avengers 2 on DVD and the contest is very simple to enter. I won’t give you the specifics. You have to visit Digital Entertainment News for that and you can find the contest page here.
Daniel says that I’m not eligible for the contest, which bummed me out in principle. But I already went out and bought Ultimate Avengers 2 on DVD last Friday. So if I won, it would have been eBay fodder anyway!
But the movie is really good and Daniel is being very generous so check out his site and enter his contest already!
I think I remember hearing about Snakes On A Plane back in late February or early March of this year. I didn’t know anything about the movie beyond the fact that the title was brilliant and so was the casting of Samuel L. Jackson.
Weeks and months fell off the calendar and we were treated to more and more information about the movie. The teaster poster came out with it’s parody of the caduceus medical symbol. Then the first trailer. Momentum built as the blogosphere adopted S.O.A.P. as the poster child of the "so bad it’s good" movement. Parody songs were being written. People were coming up with their own versions of the poster. It seemed as though everyone was in on the joke. From a marketing perspective, it was a complete windfall. A viral campaign performing better than anyone expected. People were already exlaiming Snakes On A Plane the best movie of the summer, sight unseen. They took the ball and ran with it.
Then more and more months came and went and Snakes On A Plane was nowhere to be found. Just as it seemed even you grandmother had heard about "that crazy snake movie," nothing happened.
Then there was word that the producers arranged for reshoots to make the movie more risque. They were shooting for an R rating. Still no movie. They release the far less inventive, quasi-serious "final" poster design that immediately sucked all the fun out of the previous poster design.
Then someone made a direct to video parody (?) entitled Snakes on a Train and it felt like the momentum was lost completely.
When I went to the Internet Movie Database to see what new movies were coming out this weekend, I saw Snakes on a Plane on the list and said "Really?"
I think New Line totally blew it with this movie. There was certainly an opportunity to ride the wave of goodwill generated by the internet and make this one of the biggest movies of the summer. Now it will feel like a footnote.
I still know people that are interested in seeing this movie and – admittedly – I’m still curious. But the groundswell of interest from a few months ago is completely gone. That grandma of yours that I mentioned? She’s moved onto other things. Knitting, perhaps. Baking pies. But if New Line could have gotten the timing right, she would have gone to "that crazy snake movie" to see what all the fuss was about.
My two cents, at least.
A couple of links to help you whittle away the day.
My good buddy Mitch has been updating his comic San Antonio Rock City like a man possessed. But his latest round of comics has been renamed Chicago Rock City in honor of our time spent together at Wizard World Chicago.
Your’s truly made a cameo in Mitch’s comic yesterday in a tale of commerce that is 93% factual and 100% hilarious! Check it out!
My also-good buddy Joe Dunn of the wonderful Joe Loves Crappy Movies has recently been posting a bunch of jam comics that myself, Joe, Mitch, Zach Miller of Joe and Monkey, Gordon McAlpin of Multiplex, Irvsher Fabor of Fish Tank Tango and Kevin Gleason of Retail Rage contributed to. We did five altogether and some of them are a little… well, gay. I don’t mean "gay" in a negative way. I mean "gay" like homoerotic. I also mean "gay" as in happy. Because we had a great time putting these together.
Joe linked to all five comics in his latest blog. It’s about half way down the page and you can find them here.
Check out all of these links! You won’t regret it!
I seriously have no idea what I was trying to do with today’s strip.
I think the idea crept in my head that it would be funny for Tom to pick up the phone and do a little sarcastic play acting. But then the twist would be that someone actually called! Hilarious, right?
Hmmm… "laborious" is more like it.
Oh, well. They can’t all be Eisner Award Winners!
I wanted to let everyone know that I’ve been dedicating a much of my time as possible to sending out all of the pre-ordered copies of Theater Hopper: Year One. It’s taking me a while to do it because I promised everyone who pre-ordered before the June 11 deadline a free sketch in their books. I’m not half-assing this, folks. I’m making these sketches nice. You’re going to love ’em.
I’ve been completing an average of about ten books a day. And then every day that follows, over my noon hour I go to the post office and mail out ten at a time. Let me tell you that the post office people LOVE me. Ugh.
At any rate, I’m working hard to get caught up and a few of you should be receiving your books any day now if you haven’t already.
I’m very curious to hear your reactions to the book. The response at Wizard World Chicago was strong, but I want to know what you guys think. Additionally, if anyone know where I might be able to ship out a few copies to be reviewed, that would be great. I was planning on including a "Notes of Praise for ‘Theater Hopper: Year One’" in the liner notes of Theater Hopper: Year Two.
Incidentally, I should mention that (because I am a glutton for punishment) and am going to start working on Theater Hopper: Year Two this weekend. It’s my goal to have it finished by September 29 so I can hand it off to Josten’s and get them back in time to take with me to Wizard World Dallas on November 10 – 12. I hope to have all the comics laid into the template on Saturday and then chisel away at the copy by trying to write 50 pages every week.
Cami and I were talking about it last night and I was wrestling with what kind of extras to toss into the book. I tried to have someone write a foreward for Year One and that fell through. So I was trying to think of someone else to write the foreward this year and Cami nominated herself! I think it’s a brilliant idea. I mean, wouldn’t you want to read a foreward written by the wife of the creator. A woman who happens to be represented as a character in said book? Great outsider perspective but with insider knowledge! I’d read it!
I’m a little psyched out because I’m trying to put together a book in about 4 weeks when the first one took me about 4 months to do. But at this stage of the game, I have all my research done, my template is ready to go and I’m experienced. I’ve been around the block with this thing now, so the second book should go faster.
Profits from the first book have given me a head start on covering costs for the second. But if you’d like to reduce the amount of time you have to wait for Theater Hopper: Year Two to fall into your hands, order a copy of Theater Hopper: Year One today. It’s an investment in your future!
Cami and I are just competely burned out on all things related to Snakes On A Plane. But a few of the people who post in the THorum who have seen it really like it and say it’s a great community experience. That’s probably the greatest value of the movie and I know I’ll be shooting myself in the foot if I don’t see it this weekend to tap into that vibe. Surely two weeks from now, people won’t be as hyped during screenings.
That said, Cami and I are probably going to see Accepted this weekend. What can I say? We think Justin Long is really funny. We’ve been fans of his ever since he was on Ed on NBC a few years ago. He’s always great in those supporting roles he has in films like Dodgeball. If Vince Vaughn, Owen Wilson and Will Ferrell are all part of The Frat Pack, Justin Long is pledging next year.
That’s it for today. Have a great weekend!
I’m starting to get a little static in the THorum for what has developed into my anti-Snakes On A Plane agenda. I don’t care. I’m like a hound dog with a bone. You’re not gonna shake this lose. If there were people out there declaring themselves hard-core S.O.A.P. fans before it hit theaters, I’m allowed to have a dissenting opinion and declare it overhyped. I don’t need to see it to have that opinion confirmed. It’s poor box office speaks for itself.
Snakes On A Plane did $15 million this weekend. It’s nothing to sneeze at, I suppose. Especially considering the overall downturn of American box office tallies. But at the same time, for a film that’s been hyped since February – adopted as the internet’s love child – $15 million doesn’t impress me.
It’ll make it’s budget back and I’m sure it’ll live in infamy as the first big-budget Hollywood movie to be both influenced by and spin the overwhelming interest of the internet to it’s advantage. In that respect, it will be a success. A miniscule triumph of marketing over content.
But Snakes On A Plane could have been so much more! Y’see… that’s what you guys don’t understand about my criticisms. I criticisize because I love!
If New Line had left well enough alone and released S.O.A.P. when interest was at a fever pitch, they could have had a monster on their hands. What people overlook is that the movie wrapped in September of 2005. Word started to leak in February of 2006 and by the time the internet got a hold of it by April, ironic hipsters were in a frenzy. Two months later the mainstream media got a hold of it and the whole country was primed.
New Line should have released S.O.A.P in June. They could have been the forerunner of the ’06 blockbuster season. The biggest, dumbest B-movie that America would have fallen head over heels for since Armageddon. In June of ’06, I was READY to see this movie. I was right there with the rest of you!
But then, like a gallon of milk set out in the hot summer sun, it spoiled. It was overhyped and I lost interest. I got tired of waiting!
Clearly the five week reshoot to add more "rated R" material didn’t help it. A $15 million dollar opening weekend communicates only one thing – that the internet interest in a film doesn’t translate into a box office success. If I was someone who went to the effort of making a parody song or poster, invested all this time believing that the movie was going to be the best thing since sliced bread… I would feel a little used.
I mean, didn’t you get the sense from reading all of these blogs and visiting all of these web sites that talked about how great S.O.A.P. was going to bewere in it partially to show that the internet has real-world influence? That we’re not just sitting in our basements, firing off angry diatribes at Ain’t It Cool News and leaking screenplays to CHUD? That we actually CONTRIBUTE to the filmmaking process somehow? Then the film does $15 million in it’s first weekend after nearly HALF A YEAR of buildup and the influence of the internet is revealed to be a paper tiger.
For someone like myself who communicates his art primiarily through the internet, I can understand why having a dissenting opinion would be unpopular. It smacks of biting the hand that feeds you. And I understand that I’m being harsh by declaring the movie "over" without even seeing it. But I have a real issue with being hoodwinked by marketing – organic, viral or otherwise and in this instance, I didn’t want to play into it. I don’t mind having my strings pulled from time to time. Just don’t let me see the hands of the puppeteer.
I could be all wrong about S.O.A.P. Friends I’ve talked to says it delivers exactly what you want it to. A million different death-by-snake scenarios and an entertaining ride. Maybe word-of-mouth will spur an incredible comeback at the box office for the second week. Who knows? But I think, ultimately, it’ll end up being a big cult film on DVD and by next month most people will have forgotten completely about it.
When you think about it, is that so bad? I mean, hipsters would have made this movie their own regardless of the hype. This time around they got a wild hair up their rear and tried to spread their enthusiasm to the mainstream. They failed, but that’s nothing to be ashamed of.
Between the e-mails I’ve been getting, the feedback in the THorum and the LiveJournal feed, I’ve been taking a lot of hits regarding my criticisms of Snakes On A Plane so I figured now was the time to clarify some of my points.
1. When I declare the movie is over-hyped, I am not referencing the quality of the movie itself nor am I attacking you personally for enjoying it. I am talking about the marketing of the film and how I felt it is over done.
2. Citing the opening weekend box office of S.O.A.P. was evidence I used to support my point. When analysts such as Box Office Guru, Coming Soon and Entertainment Weekly estimated an opening weekend in the $30 million dollar range ($28 million, $30.8 million and $31 million respectively), there was obviously a wide gap between expectations and results. To me, it was a clear indication that there were others who felt the same way I did – they were once excited about the movie, but now wanted nothing to do with it due to the overbearing promotion.
3. If it helps, consider the analogy of a song on the radio. You hear a song on the radio and you’re into it for the first few months. Then they start playing it to much and you get sick of it. Doesn’t mean that it isn’t a good song. You’re just tired of hearing it. That’s how I felt about S.O.A.P. and that’s what I decided to write about.
4. I am allowed to have an opinon about a movie without seeing it. I’ve been getting a lot of e-mails in this regard. "How can you hate it without seeing it?"
First of all, I never said I hated the movie. It’s very possible that I’ll see it someday on DVD and enjoy it. But if two-thirds of the internet is allowed to geek out and say they LOVE S.O.A.P. based on the title alone, why am I not allowed the same lack of objectivity?
I write the comic from a personal viewpoint. I am not beholden to any kind of journalistic ethics or standards. I am a human being and I am allowed to have my own tastes and opinions. I don’t need to filter that or shield my bias if we happen not to feel the same way about things.
You guys have to give me that breathing room – that freedom to exaggerate – in order for me to keep producing this comic. To insist that I see EVERY movie that comes out before I make fun of it is unrealistic and would put me in a creative straight-jacket.
In addition to investing the time to do three strips a week (for free, mind you), I have a 9 to 5 job and commitments to my wife and family. It’s simply not possible for me to see everything and still have a life for myself.
5. If anyone was offended by the last three comics, I’m sorry. But at the same time, things wouldn’t be very interesting if we agreed on everything all the time, now would it?
I’m not saying that I’m going to stir things up for the sake of it. Frankly, this "fight" has taken a lot out of me. So you can expect a little less politicizing for a while. But, man… we all got to stop taking these things so personally. Let’s just say that yesterday’s Yirmumah strip really hit a nerve with me.
If anyone has questions or concerns, feel free to send me an e-mail. But I feel like I’ve said pretty much everything that needs to be said here.
I took a step back from all the controversy generated from the last three strips and decided to have a little fun with it. I felt both sides were starting to take themselves a little too seriously and I just wanted to put a fork in it.
So that’s it. That’s all I have to say about Snakes On A Plane. What’s next?
Oh, I thought you guys might get a kick out of this photo:
It’s the very last of the Theater Hopper: Year One pre-orders. I sat down this weekend and cranked out a TON of sketches. Over 80 in all, I think. What can I say? I wanted this off my plate!
I was able to do a handful of orders before these and those people who placed their orders the earliest are seeing their books in the mail this week. I actually got a very nice write up from Jacob over at the web comic Blue Sky. Here’s an exerpt:
Of course this being a collection of the first year the art isn’t as refined as what you see on his site today, but that’s not really much of an issue because it’s the writing that sells it. And since I’m on the art anyway, the cover is perfect for this type of webcomic and I loved the backcover when it turned the book over. Perfect.
It was a really nice review and Jacob actually gave me some ideas for "Theater Hopper: Year Two." If you’d like to read the rest of his comments, please visit Blue Sky.
Incidentally, if you’ve gotten your copy of the book, please send me your feedback. I’m very interested to hear what worked and what didn’t. I’m fast-tracking "Theater Hopper: Year Two" so I can debut it at Wizard World Dallas in November, so I want to try an integrate as many suggestions as I can!
For example, my good friend Daniel over at Digital Entertainment News got his copy and told me he really enjoyed it. The one thing he thought was missing was the original date of publication on the strips. I honestly never would have thought of that and it’s a valuable suggestion! So please, write in with your opinions! I’m interested in hearing from you!
Something else that’s going on over at Digital Entertainment News is a contest that Daniel wanted me to talk to you about. Right now he has 5 copies of a PS2 game to give away called Brave. The contest runs until September 8, but Daniel is encouraging everyone to get their entries in early. He has ANOTHER contest that he’s running on Friday that’s so secret, he can’t tell me about it! Good stuff!
If you want to enter for a chance to win a copy of Brave, click here and submit your information!
In regards to the mailing of the books, I’ve been visiting the post office every day and sending out about 10 at a time. So, hopefully I’ll be done sending out everything I have by next week. So the very last person to get their book domestically will probably see it the last week in August. International orders will take a little longer. You guys might not see your books until mid to late September. I know some of you have been waiting since April and that’s a really long time. So I appreciate everyone’s patience. I think you’ll be very happy with what is being sent to you and now I can take what I’ve learned from this experience and use it to turn around "Theater Hopper: Year Two" even faster. There will be a MUCH shorter waiting period the second time around and I hope I can count on your support. A hearty "Thank you!" to everyone who has shown their support thus far!.
That’s all for the time being. I hope you enjoyed today’s comic!
I know the title for today’s comic is cheesy as all get-out, but I don’t care. I’m just going to sit back and bask in the first celebrity caricature I’ve drawn in the last four years that didn’t look like total crap.
Maybe you don’t think it looks like Tom Cruise, but I’m really happy with it. Caricature is one of my most prominent deficiencies (y’know, aside from being unfunny or uninsightful – but I’m talking about artistic deficiencies here!) I’ve been trying to get better at it. Small steps, folks. Small steps.
I’ll be back later in the day with more to say about Tom Cruise being kicked to the curb by Sumner Redstone at Paramount Pictures. It’s shaping up to be a very interesting story.
I know we’ve beat this horse to death, but I wanted to direct you guys to an article that
Owen does a great job of addressing some of the very same concerns I had, but phrases them in a much more thought out way. He does this by citing the last great internet-by-means-of-marketing success story The Blair Witch Project and drawing comparisons to Snakes on a Plane forthwith. He draws the line between marketing’s siren song and the organic need to see a film of your own accord.
This was part of the debate I tried to generate. At what point do we become slaves to the buzz we create and at what point does genuine interest dictate the success of a film? Or, as Owen puts it, what do we sacrifice when fans turn themselves into marketers so they can be at the center of the action?
If you’re interested in getting a little extra insight on my position on Snakes on a Plane, Owen’s article comes from the same place I was.